How to Pierce the I-bubble!
WAK Coe grew up (I wish! Ed.) under the influence of Michael Wharton, who, for 20 years beginning in the 1950s, fought what was called an “infamous war on reality” in his Peter Simple column for The Telegraph. We may not like all of Wakco’s views, but we respect his right to express them and, in all honesty, we love having him with us, difficult though it is sometimes, because he has the capacity to make us think and to laugh!? The Editor
Might there be times when being ‘creative’ with the facts becomes detrimental to the ‘well-being’ of others?
It is sometimes said, rather unkindly in my view, that my version of the ‘Way of the World’ can be a tad weird, but that said, like a lot of folks, I have been thinking about the stuff going on around me these days.
Recently, I was trying to absorb the implications of what seemed, on the surface, to be a totally different response in the press and by governments to ‘protests and protestors’. On the one hand, we had 24 arrests during the march by the extreme right, offering their Trumpian views and calling for a revolution. Then, a few days later, it was apparently also OK to demonstrate on parade to show how hurt we are (and rightly so) about two Jewish people killed in one of our northern cities.
Yet on the same morning, we were not to protest on our streets when it was widely reported that 18,000 +/- of Gaza’s children had been killed by Israeli strikes. So we had a group of c. 900, seemingly, older people, being arrested during protests about what is going on in Gaza and the West Bank (one, apparently carrying a banner: ‘Plasticine Action ….. !?).
It’s hard to get hold of the meaningful data (something to think about in itself?), but it made me wonder if we are living under the same rules in terms of ‘being tolerated’ by ‘our’ police and ‘our’ government? I am asking myself, was this an example of being creative with both ‘the words and the facts’ to create, surreptitiously, the illusion of well-being across the communities that is actually riven at its heart?
To little olde me, it’s simple: both are abhorrent, but one is the act of a seemingly crazed individual, whilst the other is a matter of policy operated by an apartheid regime that is allegedly engaged in ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ etc. The scale and raisons d’être are wildly different, but I see the same trends in our communications regarding Israel and the Palestinians.
That said, during my present deliberations, and before taking pen to paper, I decided to chat to my teammate on theCafé. Michael has spent much time in both the Arab world and in the (former) US of America, and I know that as a youth, he was very taken with books like Exodus and Catch 22, by Leon Uris, Joseph Heller, and the rest. Discussing with him the ongoing tragedy in Palestine and Israel, he shared with me two personal memories that had impacted his understanding and convictions.
In one, a small personal experience, a close English, Jewish friend of many years standing, remarked in a conversation about the miseries of Palestinians in the occupied West Bank: “But, Mike, the Palestinians are not nice people”.
Several years previously, when Michael was in the countryside near Nablus, with Munib, a leading Palestinian businessman, Michael had expressed to him his admiration of the Exodus saga and the rest. Munib listened and then invited him to take a look around and tell him what he saw. Michael was careful and polite, but he pointed out that all the Palestinian farms were neglected, whilst the Jewish farms were well cared for and flourishing in every sense. He recounts that Munib nodded sagely and invited him to look again: Michael did so and mentioned the ‘oil rigs’ he could see. “Not oil rigs, Mike” was the response, “water wells… and those rigs can drill at an angle. They have been placed to deny water to the Palestinian farms and divert it to those of the Israelis. Moreover,” he said, “the Israeli farmers are now buying the Arab lands cheaply because they are no longer tenable”.
Michael relates how, with growing dismay, he subsequently went on to read some of TE Lawrence and Glub Pasha (John Bagot Glubb) and David Ben-Gurion’s books, memoirs and reported statements. Ben-Gurion included something to the effect that he feared that the political ‘proportional representative system’ in Israel might ultimately destroy the country. And now, some think it did just that and, perhaps, a bit more.
I was very taken by How to pierce the Israeli bubble by Noam Sheizaf, a journalist and documentary filmmaker based in Tel Aviv. I find that I have rarely come across a writer and writings that express my concerns so thoroughly. Often, I think ‘it’s not right’ and ‘it’s not fair’ and then, lacking the skills and/or intellect, I get stuck in that mental cul-de-sac. But, in essence, Mr Sheizaf seems to be suggesting that there is a growing body of opinion in Israel that we should care less about the ‘Palestinian State’ and think more about how Palestinians and Israelis might share a nation in which ALL law-abiding inhabitants have equal rights and freedoms.
United we Stand
The idea of ‘united we stand’ takes its form from way back in human history: Aesop’s fables, particularly ‘The Four Oxen and the Lion’, and even The Bible (Matthew 12:25), though in a slightly different form. The phrase was also used by Winston Churchill in 1941 to emphasise the importance of unity during wartime, when it gained significant traction. It also occurred to me that this is not a new proposition or challenge.
Half a lifetime ago, on September 3, 1975, in the then much-troubled South Africa, the Prime Minister, Vorster, referred somewhat dismissively to a few of the problems confronting South Africa and dealing with the policy of “separate development”. He did so, it was said at the time, “in a particularly effective way”. That (apartheid!) turned out well!
On Tuesday, Sept. 15, 2020, Trump and the others signed the Abraham Accords, which basically called for a strategic alliance between Israel and some Arab states.
Well, here we are in October 2025, and Trump version 2! Good luck with that! After Iran, Yemen, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, not forgetting a little place called ‘Doha’ (where the USA has one of its biggest military bases)…. Saudi Arabia and Pakistan (which has nuclear weapons) have signed a ‘mutual defence pact’. (BTW what joy, thinking of ‘Trump 2’, it seems that the Nobel Peace Prize Committee does not accept credit cards?)
The undisputable fact is that in today’s Israel, the Palestinians have, quite simply, no rights and their very existence in ‘Palestine’ is considered an affront at every level by the right wing of Israeli politics and parts of the administration and the application of its religion. ‘The Israeli airports authority, which oversees the Allenby Bridge crossing, said it would be closed indefinitely’. Indeed, the very existence of ‘Palestine’ is considered by some, on the right, to be an existential threat with ancient, deeply held religious connotations.
Which, in effect, means that if we were looking in the direction of that ‘single state solution’, then we might/should pause to take in the research and ideas offered by some of those who might know a bit about the topic… researching the dynamics of Ethnopolitics Alice Engl’s sets out:
‘Using a transnational regionalism lens, it [the Paper] examines how minorities, majorities, sub-state political elites and the media perceive and utilise cross-border spaces. The findings reveal contested perspectives among sub-state political elites, influenced by historical conflicts, while the media emphasise the connective role of the state border.
Furthermore, autonomist parties and representatives contribute to framing cross-border cooperation as a means of connection and shared territorial policymaking. The research highlights the potential of sub-state to foster inclusive cross-border relations in minority contexts and empower minority communities in border regions, offering insights into integration and connection beyond ethnic and territorial divisions.’
Meanwhile, my dreaded AI overview tells me: ’Bringing different people together within borders involves fostering understanding and connection through open communication, shared experiences, and the establishment of inclusive structures such as community initiatives, professional associations, or cross-cultural exchange programs. Strategies include demonstrating cultural sensitivity, promoting respectful dialogue, recognising diverse perspectives, and creating opportunities for people to collaborate on common goals to build trust and unity across different groups within a defined geographic or political area’.
Principles & Strategies
Key Principles & Strategies:
- Leadership by Example
- Promote Open Communication
- Foster Shared Experiences
- Cultivate Cultural Sensitivity and Respect
- Build Trust Through Relationships
- Establish Inclusive Structures
- Recognize and Value Diversity
- Use Clear and Humble Language
By implementing these strategies, the goal is to break down barriers, encourage mutual understanding, and unite different people into a cohesive whole within shared national or organisational boundaries.
But, in the world of that mode of thinking, how could any reasonable person not oppose minority rule?! And how might it even be possible for such people to finally come to share power?!!
Even ‘the Donald’ has said something that, articulated by anyone else, might emerge as an informed opinion, about ‘Hamas and terror.’ For the purposes of clarity and the avoidance of doubt, I utterly condemn that which Hamas claims to have done on October 7, but that said, what they did that day, perhaps out of desperation, was no different from that done throughout history by people who felt their existence was threatened and their most passionate beliefs denied: such as,
- Militant Zionist Underground Army, The Irgun Zvai Leumi, Are Investigated, As Well as The Activities Of The Stern Group and The Haganah.
- The main terrorist groups were Irgun Zvai Leumi (National Military Organisation) – ultimately led by future Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin – and an even more militant organisation, Lohamey Heruth Israel (Fighters for the Freedom of Israel) or LHI.
- The British called LHI the Stern Gang after its leader, Abraham Stern, who was killed in a clash with the Palestine Police in 1942. In November 1944, LHI assassinated the British Minister for the Middle East, Lord Moyne.
- The King David Hotel; ‘96 people died in this atrocity, which remains the highest death toll for British subjects in a terrorist attack; further notes that an event was held in Jerusalem to celebrate this event and that prominent members of the Knesset, including former Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, attended.
- Jomo Kenyatta ( c. 1897 – 22 August 1978) was a Kenyan anti-colonial activist and politician who governed Kenya as its Prime Minister from 1963 to 1964 and then as its first President from 1964 to his death in 1978.
- Nelson Mandela’s arrest near Howick in Natal province, South Africa, on August 5, 1962, ended his run as South Africa’s most wanted fugitive. Dubbed the Black Pimpernel by his Security Branch pursuers, he used disguises and aliases to evade the authorities for nearly a year and a half.
- ‘Jewish resistance in Warsaw culminated in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising in 1943, sparked after the Germans deported over a quarter-million Jews in 1942. Jewish fighters from groups like the Jewish Combat Organization (ŻOB) and Jewish Military Union (ŻZW) organized and fought against Nazi forces who were attempting to liquidate the ghetto.
In a conversation with Mr Gandhi, who mentioned (in passing) ‘The Jallianwala Bagh massacre’ when asked, “What do you think of Western civilisation?” Gandhiji allegedly replied, “I think it would be a wonderful idea“.
Equally, fighting back, or ‘resistance’, is not always pretty: ‘Collaboration included Jewish groups who supported the Nazis’ ascent to power, Jewish institutions in Nazi-created ghettos, Jewish agents working for the German secret services, and Zionist groups collaborating with Germany to facilitate European Jews. After the end of the war, alleged Jewish collaborators were put on trial in Israel, Europe and the Soviet Union.’
Drawing on examples like Belgium, Canada, or South Africa’s rainbow nation framework, there are some advocates for some form of a consociational system. This could take the shape of a grand coalition to ensure that both Palestinian and Israeli Jewish peoples have seats at the ruling table, thereby diluting the possibility of hegemonic power. The notion of a mutual veto or a concurrent majority would also empower distinct groups to shield their fundamental interests from being overridden by collective decisions. Intrinsically linked to this is the concept of segmental autonomy, which allows distinct communities to self-govern in matters that are central to their identity, thus fostering a sense of agency and belonging.
The principle of proportionality is key—it prescribes equitable representation across the political spectrum and fair distribution in civil service appointments and in the allocation of public funds.
The one-state solution, including allowing/ enabling the Palestinians who left/or were forced out (NAKBA), to return, would be a prime requirement, along with the UN’s ‘equal rights for all’. And why not, after all, the present-day refusal by Israel and its allies has, along with other things, fuelled seven decades of suffering.
For many, the change is a necessity, and in the context of a pan-Arab solution like the ‘Abraham Accords’, one might refer to Samuel Beckett telling us through the character Estragon in Waiting for Godot, “’It can’t go on like this’, to which Vladimir responds ‘That’s what you think!’ “ – indicating that whilst the current situation feels impossible, it doesn’t mean it has to end or cannot continue.
But surely this particular situation cannot be allowed to continue. And, given the current distribution of the existing population in Israel/Palestine, it is hard to imagine anything other than that, in the long run, a democratic single state, well supported by the rest of the world via the UN, is likely to be the only possible way that such ‘something’ might be achieved on a lasting basis.
It is grievously sobering to contemplate of an opportunity lost over 70 years ago, when the Swedish diplomat and nobleman, the UN Security Council’s Mediator for a peace proposal in the Arab-Israeli conflict of 1947-48, was assassinated in Jerusalem by the Zionist Lehi.
“Peace be upon you“, or if you prefer “, As-salamu alaykum”




Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!